The journal adopts a double‑blind peer review process, in which the identities of both authors and reviewers are concealed throughout the review procedure to ensure objectivity and impartiality.

Each submitted manuscript is evaluated by three independent expert reviewers with relevant academic expertise in the manuscript’s field.

In cases where the reviewers’ reports are conflicting, the final decision is determined based on the assessment of the third reviewer.

The peer review process typically takes between 4 and 8 weeks. Authors are notified of the editorial decision and provided with the reviewers’ comments and recommendations.

The journal affirms that all decisions regarding the acceptance, revision, or rejection of manuscripts are based solely on scientific quality, originality, and reviewers’ evaluations, without any external influence.